“I do.” …or do I?

I’m going to a wedding this week, and it got me thinking about relationships and characters.  I’ve talked before about imposing a writer’s own cultural values and beliefs on characters, but it’s equally problematic to impress your specific morals on them.  Or, when the character is specifically designed contrary to your own morals, it’s easy to slip into a very biased, skewed, and stereotypical view.

Below is my own sort of self-case study.  I would love to know what others think, and how to avoid literary bias, if that’s even possible.  Comment away!

In Worldtree, the “element” that influences a particular Elfin race (water, fire, earth, metal, wind, darkness, light, etc.) determines their characteristics.  The Elves in my world haven’t achieved Tolkeinesque perfection yet, so there is discord, a lot of which stems from this elemental bias.  Their elements determine everything: which god of the pantheon they worship, how long they live, their temperaments (including love, hate, racism, and tendency to murder), and whether their relationships are pure and true, possessive, or brief and meaningless.  I don’t have “marriage” for most of them, because relationships are usually either more of a spiritual connection or completely casual.

In general, I think I’ve kept my own personal views out of it by imposing this diversity on them.  I think I’ve done an alright job of not saying “this one’s bad” and “this one’s superior” for the most part by justifying it with their nature.  Personal vignettes do a lot to that end, forcing you to sympathize with the character’s point of view (but I don’t yet have all those vignettes done for the different races).

…but at the same time, a reader with a personal bias will look down on whoever they please, as though my Elves have a choice in the matter, because the human bias is always there.  I feel like, even if I write it perfectly, someone might say that the wind Elves are capricious, hedonistic sinners and the metal Elves are hateful, violent demons.

I guess the question then becomes: do people like that read a lot of fantasy?

It’s hard to say.  A lot of fantasy novels do subscribe to traditional moral standards (which may be because of the writer and not the reader); a lot of other fantasy novels subscribe to whatever they feel like.  But it’s hard to relate, for some of us, to a barbarian or a viking without at least a twinge of “what a disgusting person” based on our own civility.  So why not make that barbarian a paragon of freedom?  Why not have that viking be an adventurer instead of the pillager he is?

But then we get to the Sesame Street problem.  If we make cookie monster eat veggies and make Oscar not-so-grouchy, we lose diversity.  That show is supposed to prepare children for the world, where obese gluttons and unimpressed dickheads await.  Diversity in characters adds to a setting, and to realism, even if it’s not something we necessarily like.

I think this rant is quite long enough.  The equation is too complex, and the human variable determines everything.  What do you think?


3 thoughts on ““I do.” …or do I?

  1. The idea of diversity got me thinking. I remember recommending a very bizarre movie to one of my friends and after watching it he told me I was actually sick because the movie was awful (though I never said it was great, just said it was peculiar)) Anyway, I said in my defense that sometimes art depicts characters as they could be in real life – just as disgusting, or as vile – for the sake of showing the reality. My friend said that if there’s filth in life it doesn’t mean one has to make a movie about it. Somehow, I tend to agree. Literature is there to teach us about values and morals taking real life as example, but making this example disguised enough for us to perceive as a teaching tool.

    • Svapne says:

      I agree that a lot of people don’t want to see the ugly side of humanity, or of whatever else one’s writing is about.

      But, out of curiosity, what kind of movie was it?
      -There are awful, disgusting things that show the worst of humanity (I could have been very happy never having seen Cannibal Holocaust).
      -There are sad things that show atrocities (like Tears of the Sun or the Elephant Man or even the documentary on the girl with the horrible growth that got a whole new face).
      -But it’s comparatively rare to find a movie that gets into the mind of the bad guy, which is a dark and terrible place (and can kill suspense- we won’t be wondering what his next premeditated act is if we watch him premeditate). Then you have to know if the bad guy is truly evil, or mislead, or misunderstood (the redemption of the bad guy is a favorite trope over here).

      Personally, I don’t write a lot of un-relatable villains, and I get cozy in their heads for a while so we understand them. I don’t usually go for pure evil.

      Then again, I was recently “accused” of sociopathy. 😛

  2. The movie was called “the Paperboy”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s